Different scholars and different strict logicians have over many, numerous hundreds of years, given a rundown of what characteristics or properties a Supreme Deity or Maximally Greatest Being would have. Physicists hold back since the rundown being referred to bodes well, as we’re going to find. Quite a bit of what pursues comes from an on-line banter I had with my old ‘companion’ the “Unplanned Meta-Physician”. While I respect his everything weapon’s bursting philosophical confidence, his physics leaves a ton to be wanted.
Creator’s Note: Rather than name names and along these lines incorporate and reject certain divine beings from different religious philosophies, I’ll simply utilize a sweeping expression “Incomparable Deity” or “SD”. People of varying religions can substitute their own particular god as they wish.
As per one understood present day strict scholar, William Lane Craig, the element (for example – Supreme Deity) behind the making of the Universe needed to have been itself uncaused, starting less, invariable, endless, ageless, space-less, a unimportant all-amazing being who is an individual operator, blessed with opportunity of the will. Ideally, when you’ve arrived at the finish of this expositions, these attributes will be seen as all out rubbish.
PHYSICS: DEBATING THE EXISTENCE OF A SUPREME DEITY
“Things”, like a Supreme Deity (SD), would have certain properties. Things with specific properties have structure and substance. Things with structure and substance are physical things. Physical things can affect other physical things. Non-physical things, similar to Wednesday, have no structure and substance. The idea of Wednesday can’t have any physical impact on state a billiard ball. A billiard ball can’t have any impact on the idea of Wednesday. In this way, non-physical things (ideas) can’t influence physical things, and the other way around. Since a SD, being, as per a few religious philosophies, a non-physical element (an idea with no structure and substance), can’t in this manner have any impact on or make or devastate physical things. Nonetheless, non-physical ideas can affect other non-physical ideas. The idea of a SD may give some the idea to be an increasingly good individual, yet that isn’t forced on anybody by a non-physical SD but instead that profound quality originates from inside. A physical divinity obviously could instruct you to be good or else physical outcomes will pursue.
In the event that the Universe was state made out of a sum of 1000 iotas, at that point any Supreme Deity (SD) who made the Universe couldn’t be made out of any molecules generally the entirety of particles in the Universe would indicate more than 1000. In this manner any SD, any otherworldly maker, must be non-physical as indicated by certain theists. In contrast to theists, I state that the non-physical can’t make the physical. Not in any case a SD can make something from nothing, particularly if that Supreme Deity was likewise non-physical.
Quite a long time ago there was this Supreme Deity, who was non-physical, who was interminable however not vast. For some obscure and unexplained reason(s), He/She/It decided* some place on down the track, to make a physical universe, complete with life and simply everything. How would you do that on the off chance that you don’t have anything physical to work with? Regardless of whether this SD were physical all by itself, it wouldn’t have any crude materials from which to take a shot at or with. In this way, here’s a minor departure from some standard cosmology. The SD – a physical SD – actually went all to pieces, broke apart, and dissipated Himself/Herself/Itself into the void and became as one with the Universe. The SD is the Universe and passes by the name of Mother Nature!
*How you can choose anything in the event that you are non-physical and come up short on any neurological foundation or framework is very past me.
So here we have this transcendent substance, this Supreme Deity (SD), who is non-physical, who has existed forever (however not endlessly so which appears to be an inconsistency to me yet clearly not to strict scholars), and in an immortal state for sure. At that point for some absolutely unexplained explanation this substance traversed the Rubicon into time by making a physical universe, however not an unending universe; made it out of literally nothing for no evidently valid justification other than “what the hell; why not; I’m exhausted” (my statements). Do you, the peruser, have any appreciation of how absolutely absurd that sounds? In the event that you ran over that situation or idea for the absolute first time in a novel, you’d be on the whole correct to scrutinize the creator’s mental stability or their medication use.
Immortality is a crazy difficulty since that would require a working temperature of outright zero (discrediting any conceivable change, consequently movement occurring, in this way making the idea of time useless). A condition of total zero isn’t really reachable. In the event that you have even the littlest measure of progress, in this manner movement, you have time. I wish those supporting pockets of agelessness may, utilizing their forces of philosophical derivation, call attention to a place(s) in the Cosmos that at present exist(s) in a condition of immortality.
The progress from a condition of agelessness to a condition of time by anybody is incomprehensible since a change (a psychological idea, electrons moving at the base is required) would of needed to have happened while still in an ageless state which can’t be. You need to consider going from your ageless state into a condition of time before you really do it.
Lets learn about Vietnam physic.
